Monday, January 25, 2010

Two advils for two peoples.


“... and I accept responsibility for nothing else. If people want to have headaches among the overtones, let them. And provide their own aspirin.”

Just like Samuel Beckett's famous answer to a theater critic - last Friday in East Jerusalem, the four hour tour was free - but aspirin was not included. Sadly, it was not a play. Reality's absurd exhibition.

On the super sunny- mid January - desert morning, a bus with people from China, Germany, USA, Holland and Israel, left the heart of the hectic 2,000 years- old capital, to see for themselves what is really going on along the "Jerusalem envelope".

Just 40 minutes away, there's a beautiful beach. What are they doing on a gorgeous day like this, looking at an nine meter cement wall?

The non for profit, non partisan (City of Peoples) Ir - Amim organization tour along the security barrier, wall, fence or however you wish to call it, was too short to cover the long and complicated issue, the political and social situation of the two peoples living in one big mess.

I though I saw the big picture, a big picture. But there are many more bigger and smaller pictures I never saw before that Friday.
I lived in Jerusalem as a child, I lived a quarter of a century in Israel. I voted, I religiously follow the news, but I didn't get around to see the significant difference of the way those buildings look like. I didn't see the streets, the kids, the neglected streets and wild west caos of construction in East Jerusalem. The Jewish Democratic city.

What did the Chinese tourist on the bus got out of the "study tour"? Did any of the foreigners understand how divided and in-dividable this city is?
And what would I have done if someone had built a wall in the middle of my sacred beach?

Two peoples build, one on top of another, trying to mark as much territory as fast as possible, before the other side gets there first, making more babies, building as many balconies.

One last stop before we went back home; overlooking Judea desert, it was such a clear day, you could see down town Amman. This how small the Middle East is.

By the end of the four hour field trip, a tour packed with information, facts stats and commentary, with no time to eat, drink - you knew a little bit more, and understood much less.
Past and present were very obvious. Future - not as much.

Knowledge IS power, but when you stare at the mountains of illegal construction, hills of refugee camps, and valleys of poverty and chaos, you don't feel neither wiser nor stronger. Just a big headache.

Even though no solution makes sense, it doesn't mean there's nothing we can do.
If you don't like Ir Amim's style, if you don't want to wake up at 7 am on your day off, you can still go there, with or without the narration, just go - the images speak for themselves.

6 comments:

lukas heinrich said...

last year we had big celebrations for the anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall... it's too bad that even 20 years later this is still seen as a viable option to resolve conflict, adding to the animosity between the two while providing only marginal security benefits

btw tomorrow shimon peres will talk in our parliament, looking forward to it..

lk

Dana Rapoport said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...

Sorry Dana, but I vote in favor of the wall. I realized that after visiting and seeing, as you mentioned, how close everything is... when the danger is in gunshot distance you need to be careful.

Unknown said...

Sorry too Dana… totally agree with Hresko and the facts of reality sins the wall was build: This wall saves lives. lives from both ends! The Palestinians extremist can’t blow up buses with kids anymore and the Israelis don’t have to retaliate against them (and as a result hurt innocent Palestinians) any more. Don’t forget, Dana, how was it for you here only 5 years ago when every bus that past near you in the middle of Tel-Aviv or Jerusalem was a ticking bomb.
This wall is the best “win win” situation two losers can have.

Dana Rapoport said...

I wasn't trying to say the wall is the source of all our problems. I'm not trying to argue how effective it is. Ir Amim was actually talking about the security issue and the Israeli need. BUT -
The one thing I got from the tour, was how complicated - maybe impossible to solve, our situation is. Plus, the wall does looks very bad on TV. So I don't think it's a "win win", on the other hand, I don't have any better ideas either...

lukas heinrich said...

I would agree that the barrier had its role in decreasing active violence since its erection. But it still remains a mere military solution to a more political problem.

One could continue on this path, but should realize that in the end it would result in Israel being a hermetic high-security zone devoid of any interaction with its neighbors -- not a very fertile grond to build reconciliation or understanding between the two sides. If the main objective is safety, this might indeed be a viable option.

On the other hand, a long-term political solution should be the goal and this, I believe, can't be achieved on the basis isolation. Yes, this is easier said than done, and never having been there, I wouldn't be in a position to judge any of those matters, but I would argue that this can't and won't be a permanent solution.